Overview
Sasha and her classmates decided to form a club to organize school events. They established a rule that all members must agree before a decision is made.
The Choice
Should Sasha push ahead with the event without full consent?
Quick Stats
- Grade Band
- Grades 9-12
- Reading Level
- Level 9.605042271293378
- Word Count
- 317 words
- Published
- Mar 23, 2026
The Dilemma
Sasha and her classmates decided to form a club to organize school events. They established a rule that all members must agree before a decision is made. During a meeting, Sasha proposed a new event. Most members enthusiastically agreed, but a few were hesitant, concerned it might conflict with upcoming exams. 'We need everyone on board,' Sasha reminded, echoing their rule. While Sasha wants to respect everyone's input, she's worried that waiting for full consent might mean missing a great opportunity.
Values in Tension
This dilemma explores the tension between two important values:
Consider how these values might conflict or complement each other in this situation.
Your Options
Go ahead without full consent.
Wait for everyone's agreement.
Questions for Reflection
Take a moment to consider these questions. There are no "right" answers – the goal is to explore different perspectives and develop your own reasoning.
- 1
What are the benefits of getting full consent?
- 2
What might be lost by waiting for full agreement?
- 3
How important is it to include everyone's voice?
- 4
What are the possible outcomes of ignoring some members' concerns?
- 5
How does compromise play a role in group decisions?
Did you like this dilemma?
Philosophical Perspective
Insights from John Locke
Take a moment to form your own thoughts first, then click to explore philosophical perspectives.
